In the past year Egypt has fallen into a state of political unrest. It wasn't long ago that the former President Hosni Mubarak was over thrown to issue in a new era of politics in Egypt. Muhammad Morsi has been in power since 2011, but recently the military has forced him out of power sparking a new round of political violence. The situation in Egypt has been very unstable ever since the Arab spring and the Morsi administration has been largely ineffectual and with political instability comes political violence. Egypt is not an exception.
Just a couple of days ago killed 7 more Morsi supporters that tried to stage a sit in at Cairo University. There have been several clashes between police, Morsi supports, and Morsi disinters. Just a week ago 50 supports were killed after a clash with army troops. The Muslim Brotherhood , the party that backed Morsi claims that live ammunition was used against
protesters.
To add a twist to this internal conflict is the role that the
United States has allegedly played. The
White House continues to walk the line between classifying the current unrest
in Egypt as a coup. Many have speculated
that the US has been involved with the overthrow from the beginning. It is true that the US has never been
comfortable with the Morsi government and the US has supported coups around the
world. While the US has yet to publicly
back the new military government, they have also refused to classify what
happened to be a coup. This is because
the US is required to support any democratically elected leader against a
military coup.
This is interesting. I'm curious, though it may be out of the scope, why are we required to support any democratically elected leader against a military coup? What if NK were to democratically elect a leader?
ReplyDelete