In keeping with the Colombia theme, I will discuss the
threat of violence from narco-trafficking (or narco-terrorist) groups. Originally,
these groups were in conflict with just the host nation of Colombia in what
seemed like an endless battle. However, since the war on drugs in the 1980s,
along with the large and ever-reaching repercussions that came out of the post
9/11 era, these groups have received more and more international attention.
First of all, it has been difficult to differentiate between
narco-traffickers and a political/coup movement. The reason for this is that
most political groups start out with their ideologies leading the way, but in
order to make money, they traffic or protect the trafficking of cocaine. Eventually
a transformation occurs in which the political movement has turning into a
strictly money making organization still attempting to cling to the guise of a
political movement. This happened both with the FARC and The National
Liberation Army (ELN). For this reason, it is sometimes difficult to
classify these groups. They are definitely non-state actors, but is it a civil
war, terrorism, or a coup? This answer varies depending on the group and that
phase they might be in when it comes to their ideology and methods.
The next problem is the identification of the very word narco-terrorism.
“Originally defined in 1983 by Peruvian President Belaunde Terry, narco-terrorism
was used as a term to describe terrorist attacks on his country‘s drug enforcement
police”. However, according to The Free Dictionary narco-terrorism can
also include “Terrorism carried out to prevent interference with or divert attention
from illegal narcotics trafficking.” I believe this term is very vague on
purpose; because after 9/11 if one attaches the word “terrorist” to any type of
violence then it will most surely receive more attention and more funding.
While these groups are conducting attacks against enforcement agents and
government personnel, their methods have not drastically changed since the
1980s, so attaching this label to them seems to be a knee jerk reaction.
| This patch states: "Not one step back - Liberation or death" |
Since 2005, Colombia has done a much better job in combating
these groups. The FARC is at its weakest point in 30 years, and the ELN are no
longer able to openly conduct their transport of narcotics. While there is
still an uphill battle to fight these traffickers, this “weak state” is slowly
combating this problem with help from the international community, which mainly
includes the United States.


I think the best way to describe the situation there now is terrorism, seeing as how a group of people are acting on their own behalf and ruining parts of the country. All of it seems to be done to protect the drug trade there, which has caused a tremendous amount of damage to the people. It is good to know though that there is still some hope in battling these traffickers, and seems like it could be a country on the rebound.
ReplyDeleteTerrorism is how some see it. However, some also want to classify it as a civil war of sorts. The issue with that is the death toll year to year and some of the civilian casualties. Others want to crate a new, different classification to reflect the drug aspect of it. All of this is what makes it difficult to really classify this violence properly.
ReplyDelete